Introductions...

Nice... didn't know that you were a Monkees fan Elthair...


Oh and mister Seeker, it you aren't entirely correct when you say :

"In the beginning, Man created God"


It should read ====> "In the beginning Woman created Goddess but Man got jealous and started to worry about artificial phallus' so he destryed Goddess and created God, and told the Women that they were cursed and inferior..."


Whooops, that does sound like a rant there....

Kalis a écrit:

Nice... didn't know that you were a Monkees fan Elthair...


Oh and mister Seeker, it you aren't entirely correct when you say :

"In the beginning, Man created God"


It should read ====> "In the beginning Woman created Goddess but Man got jealous and started to worry about artificial phallus' so he destryed Goddess and created God, and told the Women that they were cursed and inferior..."


Whooops, that does sound like a rant there....

Rant away. (it's your list!)

Women make better goddesses anyway. Every man I've see try looks like a man in lingere!

Your point is well taken though. The "insertion" of the Madonna mythos into early Catholicism is an attempt to appease "goddess" centric religions of many of the early Europe.

Female goddesses were wildly recognized as equals to their male deity counterparts in early pantheons. Pity that all got screwed up.

Best regards,
Seeker

Thanks, but just coz its my list doesn't mean that I'm allowed to do whatever I want... remember it's your forum too

Kalis a écrit:

Thanks, but just coz its my list doesn't mean that I'm allowed to do whatever I want... remember it's your forum too

Kalis, your stance is very gracious, as is the creation of this forum. Without it we would not be here, so you're only living up to your station as the resident goddess and giving us all a place to play.

Thx,
Seeker

Seeker a écrit:

Science hasn't proven or disproven the existence of God, gods etc.

There's no reason why a scientist shouldn't believe in god other than their own personal belief.

Seeker

*in late^^*

In fact I thought that in the scientist' world, Scientist has'nt disproven the existence of god... And in fact, scientists' Job, is to Disprov idea (like the Earth which is (Ronde? *sait plus, trou de mémoire oO*) Like an APPLE and not like a CD ^^

And, Scientists don't try to explain sometings like Hazards(*pas sûr du mot*) or world 'creation So, they think that a god may be exist.

So, in order to do a demonstration Scientists have to do hypothesis.
If they begin ==> God Exists==> they gonna try to disproven this hypothesis...

SO For the moment ^^ They may thnik that God Exist, otherwise, they have been disprove this hypothesis ! ! ! !


*May be, one day I could speack english, and peaple understand me* Kalys you may translate if it's too much "berk"

Here are a couple of articles about Scientists religious beliefs. They are in English (sorry no translations!)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1034872,00.html

[/url]http://www.livescience.com/othernews/050811_scientists_god.html[/url]

To Methra, I appreciate your attempts at English. They are far better than my attempts at Francais!

Seeker

I'm quite pleasantly surprised by Methra's attempts at posting in english... Well done.


As for translations.

Ronde = Round, in the case of the earth the opposite to flat.
Hazard = Chance, uncontrolled and unknown variables.

terrific, i think that we enought talked about scientists religious, another topic? ^^ may be?

Dildos?

Kalis a écrit:

Dildos?

What kind? I have to admit my experience with any form of Dildo is rather limited.

Really? what a shame...

My experience too mistress...may i see your whip?

DILDO : : : Nice idea KALYSssssssss

... but, what kind of subject?

On laisse tomber.